When is this tout being banished to site promotions where he belongs again?

Search

Banned
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
130
Tokens
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=953661&page=7&p=10315339#post10315339

"Lol. Keep digging all you want out of desperation but in the end...

The Cat, in his first year at nationally-renowned Vegas Insider, finished in FIRST PLACE in the entire freaking company for baseball, while being the youngest person on a roster full of decorated and well-known handicappers throughout the entire country. In fact, it wasn't even close, as I was the only baseball handicapper that profited over $3,000 during the regular season, with only one other person coming within a thousand dollars of me.

Is that baad?

You lowly peasants should be proud of me. As one of the faces and ambassadors of this whole site, since everyone there knows I come from here while working on a national stage, I single-handedly give potentially extra exposure to peons such as yourselves, although the jealousy and high-regard you hold for my position and my success is understandable, I suppose. But hey, if you change that attitude, maybe I'll be nice enough to give you a discount on some of my baseball work next year. Maybe.

After all, considering how I ended last baseball season with my over/unders - 169-99-16 (Over 63%) - you'd be wise to invest. Certainly since you clowns probably struggle with your own gambling, based on the fact you post ZERO plays here, it would be the smartest move you've ever made in gambling.

Keep up the jealous conversation. Only makes me feel better about my job, one in which you morons wish you had, apparently. It's pretty easy to see. "
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
102,179
Tokens
so the 63% is inaccurate? that is only part of the year and not the first when he was way down?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
2,211
Tokens
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=953661&page=7&p=10315339#post10315339

"Lol. Keep digging all you want out of desperation but in the end...

The Cat, in his first year at nationally-renowned Vegas Insider, finished in FIRST PLACE in the entire freaking company for baseball, while being the youngest person on a roster full of decorated and well-known handicappers throughout the entire country. In fact, it wasn't even close, as I was the only baseball handicapper that profited over $3,000 during the regular season, with only one other person coming within a thousand dollars of me.

Is that baad?

You lowly peasants should be proud of me. As one of the faces and ambassadors of this whole site, since everyone there knows I come from here while working on a national stage, I single-handedly give potentially extra exposure to peons such as yourselves, although the jealousy and high-regard you hold for my position and my success is understandable, I suppose. But hey, if you change that attitude, maybe I'll be nice enough to give you a discount on some of my baseball work next year. Maybe.

After all, considering how I ended last baseball season with my over/unders - 169-99-16 (Over 63%) - you'd be wise to invest. Certainly since you clowns probably struggle with your own gambling, based on the fact you post ZERO plays here, it would be the smartest move you've ever made in gambling.

Keep up the jealous conversation. Only makes me feel better about my job, one in which you morons wish you had, apparently. It's pretty easy to see. "

Loudmouths like this one are never winners you don't see Billy Walters posting complaints about RX posters being jealous do you?
 

Banned
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
130
Tokens
He's cherry picking parts of the season where he ran hot, big font, bolding, italics, etc. He's been warned many, many times about not pointing to the record in suc a fashion but continues to do it. Ignores any talk about his first half where he literally was burying people. If he bet the games himself he'd have missed out on his 2nd half run because his roll would be gone. Tout pushing his snake oil should be done in the site promotions forum with the rest of them.

His whole life revolves around this forum and his tout business but he's overstepping boundaries.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
Well, I was bored this morning so I decided to do some math.

The picks he sells cost $30 for a day, $300 for a month, or $500 for half a season. So lets tackle some math.

From April to July 1st, he was:
Period: 04/01/2013 to 06/30/2013
Pick Type: All Picks
Record: 104-123-14 ( 45.8% , -3095)

Which means if his clients spent $30 per day on his package, here are the betting breakdowns: (assuming player wagers 1% of a bankroll, $100 = 1% of $10,000 bankroll)

$100 player is down $5795 ($3095 betting the plays, and another $2700 from paying for the picks) = a loss of $58% of bankroll
Then the values of losses are added by adding in $3095 in losses for each $10,000 of bankroll - ie: $200 player is down $6190

$300 a month subscription player was down ($100 players, 1% of bankroll, factoring in $3095 in losses per $10,000 of bankroll)
Loss of $3995 during the period for only a $100 bettor (more if they are a higher bettor)

Now lets look at if a player would strictly bet only 1% of bankroll which fluctuated with the current bankroll (ie: a player has only $8000 left in their bankroll, so their wager would be $80)
$100 daily subscriber is down only -$4640

$100 monthly subscriber is down only -$2840

Now for the whole season if you flat bet $100 ($10,000 bankroll, betting 1% per game as a daily subscriber:

Matt Zylbert's MLB Picks
Period: 04/01/2013 to 12/30/2013
Pick Type: All Picks
Record: 287-249-30 ( 53.5% , +1498)

Daily subscriber would be down -$4702 (-47% of bankroll)
Monthly Subscriber would be down -$502 (-5% of bankroll)
Season Subscription better would be up +$598 (+6% of bankroll)

If you multiplied the wagers per $10,000 per bankroll, they would still lose/gain the same percentage of bankrolls.

Thus, the only people that would have profited for the whole season (with a slight 6% added to the bankroll at the end of the season) would have been those that purchased the $500 half season package ($500x2 = $1000 in purchases)

The other bettors following would have lost either 47% of their bankroll, or -5% of their bankroll.

*this is assuming they played and followed every play

So depending on what you paid for, you either lost, came out very slightly behind, or barely profited
 

Banned
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
130
Tokens
Well, I was bored this morning so I decided to do some math.

The picks he sells cost $30 for a day, $300 for a month, or $500 for half a season. So lets tackle some math.

From April to July 1st, he was:
Period: 04/01/2013 to 06/30/2013
Pick Type: All Picks
Record: 104-123-14 ( 45.8% , -3095)

Which means if his clients spent $30 per day on his package, here are the betting breakdowns: (assuming player wagers 1% of a bankroll, $100 = 1% of $10,000 bankroll)

$100 player is down $5795 ($3095 betting the plays, and another $2700 from paying for the picks) = a loss of $58% of bankroll
Then the values of losses are added by adding in $3095 in losses for each $10,000 of bankroll - ie: $200 player is down $6190

$300 a month subscription player was down ($100 players, 1% of bankroll, factoring in $3095 in losses per $10,000 of bankroll)
Loss of $3995 during the period for only a $100 bettor (more if they are a higher bettor)

Now lets look at if a player would strictly bet only 1% of bankroll which fluctuated with the current bankroll (ie: a player has only $8000 left in their bankroll, so their wager would be $80)
$100 daily subscriber is down only -$4640

$100 monthly subscriber is down only -$2840

Now for the whole season if you flat bet $100 ($10,000 bankroll, betting 1% per game as a daily subscriber:

Matt Zylbert's MLB Picks
Period: 04/01/2013 to 12/30/2013
Pick Type: All Picks
Record: 287-249-30 ( 53.5% , +1498)

Daily subscriber would be down -$4702 (-47% of bankroll)
Monthly Subscriber would be down -$502 (-5% of bankroll)
Season Subscription better would be up +$598 (+6% of bankroll)

If you multiplied the wagers per $10,000 per bankroll, they would still lose/gain the same percentage of bankrolls.

Thus, the only people that would have profited for the whole season (with a slight 6% added to the bankroll at the end of the season) would have been those that purchased the $500 half season package ($500x2 = $1000 in purchases)

The other bettors following would have lost either 47% of their bankroll, or -5% of their bankroll.

*this is assuming they played and followed every play

So depending on what you paid for, you either lost, came out very slightly behind, or barely profited

BURIED. BURIAL. Can't wait for the tout math to be busted out

buried-in-sand.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,705
Tokens

$100 player is down $5795
Daily subscriber would be down -$4702 (-47% of bankroll)


:hikitty:
 

Banned
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
130
Tokens
Check in cat, dig out of the burial and drop some twatty tout math on us.
 

Banned
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
130
Tokens
<img class="previewthumb" id="vbattach_16493" alt="" src="http://www.therxforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=16493&stc=1" attachmentid="16493">
 

Attachments

  • buried_ryan_reynolds_movie_pics.jpeg
    buried_ryan_reynolds_movie_pics.jpeg
    63.4 KB · Views: 82

Banned
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
130
Tokens
Bump. He is losing it hard in the other thread. Send this **** to site promotions already.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,589
Messages
13,535,085
Members
100,377
Latest member
nocash117
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com